Meme Coin LP Farming on Robinhood Chain: $79 Into $676 in 17 Days (MaxFi AMA with DAO King)
A $79 Meme Coin liquidity position on Robinhood Chain has farmed $676 in fees in 17 days, and the token was never sold to do it. This AMA walks through why Meme Coin pools are the hardest place to run an automated LP position and the easiest place to see what no-swap rebalancing is worth: a 1% swap fee plus slippage, price impact and MEV on every reposition is what normally destroys these positions. Plus the rebalance delay saving a position that fell to $20, the community results behind it, SPY moving down to the 0.05% fee tier, and why every token is read line by line before it gets listed.
Chapters
- 0:0018 days on Robinhood Chain
- 0:17Thinking Cat: $79 in, $676 farmed
- 1:16What a traditional rebalancer costs you
- 2:06The position I almost closed at $20
- 2:41Collect fees, sell the Meme Coin, roll into blue chips
- 3:09SPY on the 0.05% fee tier
- 3:45Why volume migrates down fee tiers as a market matures
- 4:14Earning on both sides of a fee tier transition
- 5:02Portfolio structure: accumulators plus 5% degen
- 5:46Liluni: $390 in, $427 extracted
- 7:06Wide range plus long delay on a volatile token
- 7:33When price leaves your range to the upside
- 8:01Two harvests, $238 and $189, both into blue chips
- 9:20Don't pick one Meme Coin, pick several
- 10:03Presets are starting points, not optimized settings
- 10:30Why LP farming out-earns holding the same token
- 11:02Fees as a cushion, forced profit taking
- 13:04What a swap-based rebalance costs on an illiquid pool
- 13:36Snuggling up to the price instead of selling into it
- 14:07TIG: cost basis recovered in 12 days
- 15:1920 rebalances a day for two weeks
- 17:00Millions in volume against tens of thousands in TVL
- 18:19$756,000 to $953,000 in three days
- 20:29Why holding Meme Coins usually fails
- 21:27Wishbone: $100 in, $90 earned, no swap fees paid
- 22:04Index: $83 in, $92 earned, 16 days
- 23:30Words of caution: cap it at 10%
- 25:03Institutions buying tokenized stocks after hours
- 25:47A 72-hour delay to dodge weekend dislocation
- 27:34How every token gets vetted before listing
- 29:04What I can and cannot guarantee about a token
- 32:32MaxFi is 20-30% of the liquidity on these pairs
- 35:42Democratizing market making for retail
Key Takeaways
- ✓A $79 position in the HMM (Thinking Cat) pool has farmed $676 in fees over 17 days across 10 rebalances, and the token was never sold to produce that. The fees came from other people trading through the position.
- ✓Meme Coin pools are the worst environment there is for an automated LP position, which is exactly why they show what Snuggle rebalancing is worth. A swap-based reposition on one of these pools costs a 1% swap fee on the entire position, plus slippage, plus price impact, plus MEV extraction, against a book too thin to absorb any of it. And the largest cost is none of those four: selling to rebalance crystallizes the divergence at the worst moment, so a swap-based reposition realizes roughly twice the impermanent loss that Snuggle rebalancing does. A few of those and the principal is gone regardless of fees earned.
- ✓Snuggle rebalancing does not swap when it repositions. The range is redeployed on one side of the current price using the tokens already held, and it waits for price to come back through it. No swap fee, no slippage, no price impact, nothing for MEV to take, and roughly half the realized impermanent loss of a swap-based reposition.
- ✓Impermanent loss is only locked in when a rebalance actually fires. Price drifting out of your range costs you nothing by itself, which is what the rebalance delay exists to exploit. One position fell to $20 and was nearly closed; the delay is why it came back and compounded past its starting value.
- ✓Wide ranges and long delays are the Meme Coin setup. Alex runs 300% on one position, 122% on another, and 50% on a third, deliberately, because a token that spikes and retraces inside the delay window triggers zero rebalances and realizes nothing.
- ✓LP farming forces you to take profits, and that is the real edge over holding the same token. Price runs out of range to the upside, you collect the fees, you sell into strength, and you move the proceeds into something slower. No guessing at a top.
- ✓One position took $390 in and has had $427 withdrawn across two harvests of $238 and $189, both rolled into blue chip LP positions. Its cost basis is recovered and it still earns about $30 a day.
- ✓Community results are running ahead of Alex's own. TIG's $5,000 test portfolio recovered its cost basis in 12 days across a spread of pools while averaging around 20 rebalances a day, a rate that is not manually achievable. Cryptalo turned a few hundred dollars into roughly $2,000.
- ✓MaxFi distributions went from $756,000 to $953,000 in three days, an average of about $53,000 a day going back to the community in DEX fees, with combined TVL crossing $6 million across Base, Arbitrum and Robinhood Chain.
- ✓On the stocks side, volume migrates down the fee tiers as a market matures. SPY moved toward the 0.05% pool, spotted by community member Kenya-Markus, and the play is to earn on both sides of that transition rather than abandoning the 0.30% position, because competition leaves it faster than volume does.
- ✓Tokenized stocks need longer rebalance delays than crypto. Institutions have been observed buying millions of dollars of them after hours against limited on-chain supply, which can move the price 10 to 20% on chain before settlement pulls it back. A 72-hour delay sits out that round trip and realizes nothing.
- ✓Every token is read before it is listed. Verified readable source, no mint function, no pause or blacklist, no team or deployer holding half the supply, established volume and market cap, and token distribution checked for wash trading. The promise is not that the price will go up. It is that the contract cannot rug you.
$79 Into $676, and the Token Was Never Sold
Seventeen days into running MaxFi on Robinhood Chain, one position looks like a typo.
$79 went into the HMM pool, the token everyone calls Thinking Cat. It has farmed $676 in fees. Ten rebalances. Alex never sold the token to produce any of that.
That last part is the whole article. The fees came from other people trading through the position, and they accrued whether the price went up, down or sideways. The token did all three over those 17 days.
DAO King's read on why this matters:
"I'm seeing this over and over again on X. I'm seeing this on our Discord and people in the community are posting their results. At first, I thought this was like a one-off. It's not."
It is not confined to Meme Coins either. The same 17 days produced $953,000 in cumulative distributions to the MaxFi community, up from $756,000 three days earlier, which is roughly $53,000 a day going back to liquidity providers in DEX fees. Combined TVL crossed $6 million across Base, Arbitrum and Robinhood Chain.
But the Meme Coin results are the ones worth explaining, because they are the hardest case, and hard cases are where a mechanism either works or does not.
The Position That Almost Got Closed
The Thinking Cat position did not go up in a straight line. It fell to $20 or $30 in value, on a $79 deposit.
"I almost wrote it off as, oh, this position's dead. And I almost closed it. But I was like, you know what? It's only 20 or 30 bucks. I'm just going to let it ride."
Over the following two weeks it came back, rebalanced a few times, compounded itself past the initial deposit, and then the price started running. That recovery is not luck. It is a consequence of two settings, and they are the reason the rest of this works.
One Engine, Two Front Doors
This conversation is filmed on MaxFi and the assets in it are Robinhood Chain assets, so worth saying up front.
Snuggle and MaxFi run the same engine. Same no-swap rebalancing, same rebalance delay, same per-position ownership, same contracts underneath. MaxFi is where new chains and new interface work ship first. It moves fast, an active community stress-tests it, and what survives comes to Snuggle. Robinhood Chain is on that path.
So none of what follows is a preview of something you cannot use. What a swap-based reposition costs, why impermanent loss is only locked in at a rebalance, what the delay is actually protecting, why width beats tightness on a volatile token: these are properties of how Snuggle rebalancing interacts with a market, and they apply to your Snuggle positions today. The Robinhood-specific tokens are the part still in the sandbox.
Why Manual Meme Coin Farming Loses Money
Start with what normally happens when an LP position on a Meme Coin pool needs to reposition.
The standard approach is to swap back to a balanced mix and mint a new range around the current price. On a Meme Coin pool that means paying five separate costs at once:
The swap fee. These pools charge 1%. A swap-based rebalancer pays that on the entire position value, every single time it repositions.
Slippage. A book holding tens of thousands of dollars cannot absorb a several-thousand-dollar swap without the price moving against you mid-trade.
Price impact. The same problem in the other direction. Your own trade moves the market you are trading into.
MEV extraction. A predictable, public rebalance transaction on an illiquid pair is easy money for a searcher.
Twice the realized impermanent loss. This is the big one, and it is the one nobody counts. The four costs above are visible in the transaction. This one is structural: swapping to rebalance sells the token that fell and buys the token that rose, at the exact moment the two have diverged furthest. That crystallizes the divergence. A swap-based reposition realizes roughly double the impermanent loss that a no-swap reposition does, and unlike the fees, it happens on every single rebalance whether the market is thin or deep.
Alex puts the visible costs alone at several percent per rebalance on these pools, before the impermanent loss on top. Do that a handful of times and the principal is materially smaller no matter how good the fee rate looked.
"On other rebalancing systems, they do not care. They will literally obliterate your principal in a couple rebalances."
This is why most people who try Meme Coin liquidity farming manually give up. The fee rate is spectacular and the position still shrinks.
What Snuggle Rebalancing Does Instead
Snuggle rebalancing does not swap when it repositions.
When a position drifts out of range it is already sitting entirely in one of the two tokens. Instead of selling that back to a balanced mix, it redeploys the same tokens into a new range placed on one side of the current price, immediately adjacent to it, and waits for the market to come back through it.
"Instead of going from here to here really hard, you go from here and you just snuggle up to the price and let the price come back in."
Nothing is sold, so there is no swap fee, no slippage, no price impact and nothing for MEV to take. It also realizes roughly half the impermanent loss that a swap-based reposition does, because the position is never converted at the bottom of a move.
On a blue chip pair that is a useful efficiency gain. On a Meme Coin pool it is the difference between a position that works and one that gets ground down.
The Rebalance Delay Is the Setting That Matters
Here is the part that most people miss, and it is why the $20 position recovered.
Impermanent loss is only locked in when a rebalance actually fires. Price leaving your range does not cost you anything by itself. It stops you earning until price comes back, and that is all it does.
That fact is what the rebalance delay exists to exploit. Set a delay, and a token that spikes 40% and retraces within the day triggers zero rebalances, realizes nothing, and simply resumes earning when price re-enters the range.
"On these one or two day pumps that come back, I lock in zero impermanent loss."
A system with no delay does the opposite. It repositions at the top of the spike, then again on the way back down, realizing loss twice on a move that went nowhere.
This is also why width and delay work together. Alex runs 300% wide on one Meme Coin position, 122% on another and 50% on a third, deliberately. A wide range combined with a long delay means most moves resolve themselves before the system has to do anything. The trade-off is honest: if a token trends in one direction for a sustained period, you do want to follow it eventually, and the delay means you follow it late.
Taking Profits Is the Point
The strategy that turns fee income into realized money is mechanical, and it is the real edge over simply holding the same token.
When price runs out of range to the upside, the position is fully converted into the quote asset and the Meme Coin fees collected along the way are sitting at inflated prices. That is the moment to harvest.
"That's when I click collect fees and I sell Liluni and I go put it into blue chips like SPY, like wrapped ETH, Bitcoin, those kind of things."
The Liluni position is the clean example. $390 went in. $427 has come out across two harvests, $238 and $189, both rolled into longer-term blue chip LP positions. The cost basis is recovered and the position still earns about $30 a day on a 300% wide range.
DAO King's framing of why this beats holding:
"You're basically taking profits on an asset. You turn an asset into a yield-bearing asset that isn't. And you're taking profits from it. So it's forcing you to take profits."
That is the mechanism. Holding a Meme Coin requires you to guess at a top and most people guess wrong in both directions, selling too early or riding it back down. A liquidity position takes profits on your behalf every time the price runs, whether or not you have the discipline to do it yourself.
The Other Positions
The pattern repeats across the book, on small deposits:
- Wishbone. $100 in, now worth $125, with $90 earned. 122% range, 12-hour delay, three rebalances, no swap fees paid on any of them.
- Index. $83.62 in 16 days ago, worth $81 now, with $92 earned. 50% range, 8-hour delay, three rebalances. The token has been all over the place and the position does not care.
- Cash Cat. About $70 on a 20% range with a four-hour delay, which was a deliberate test of settings that should not have survived a volatile Meme Coin.
- Wire. Fell to $20 shortly after opening and recovered.
None of these are large. That is the point. They are funded with the sort of money you would be relaxed about losing, and several have already returned more than went in.
What the Community Is Doing
The results outside Alex's own book are the more interesting data, because they cover settings he did not choose.
TIG ran a deliberate test: $5,000 spread across roughly ten different Meme Coin pools with a wide mix of settings, some very tight, some very wide. Twelve days in, he had recovered his cost basis with about $550 of profit on top, and was averaging around 20 rebalances a day.
Twenty rebalances a day is the number worth sitting with. It is not achievable manually, and on a swap-based system it would be financially ruinous. It is only possible because each reposition costs nothing beyond gas.
Cryptalo turned a couple of hundred dollars into roughly $2,000 and has been withdrawing it as it accrues, running around $126 a day at the point this was recorded.
Another community member had $7,400 deployed across 17 positions and was on track for about $1,000 in a week.
These are self-reported figures from Discord screenshots rather than measurements taken from our own data, and they come from the same unusually favorable window as everything else here. What they demonstrate is not a yield to expect. It is that the mechanism is not specific to one person's settings.
The Stocks Side, Which Is the Durable Part
Meme Coins are the loud story. The tokenized stocks are the one that still matters in a year.
Two things came out of this AMA that apply directly.
Volume Migrates Down the Fee Tiers
As a market matures, trading moves from higher fee tiers to lower ones. That is not a MaxFi phenomenon, it is how every liquidity market develops, and it was happening to SPY on Robinhood Chain in real time.
Community member Kenya-Markus spotted it first and flagged that SPY volume was shifting to the 0.05% tier. On checking, that pool was outperforming every other SPY venue on the chain. It was added, and with concentrated liquidity on top of it the fee rate was running at 243% APR after hours, against about 50% in the 0.30% pool.
The instinct is to move everything into the better pool. The better play is to hold both:
"As people move out of the 0.3% fee tier pool and they move into this pool, the competition in this pool is going to drop, which means the APR and my earning rate is going to go up."
Competition leaves a pool faster than volume does. So the old pool's rate per dollar improves as providers abandon it, while the new pool captures the growing share of flow. Being in both means earning on both sides of the transition rather than picking a side of it.
Tokenized Stocks Need Longer Delays
The second finding is specific to assets whose underlying stops trading.
Alex watched a centralized exchange, OKX, buying millions of dollars of tokenized stocks after hours, against a limited on-chain supply. That kind of demand can move the on-chain price 10 or 20% away from the real share price, purely because there is not enough supply to absorb it, and then settlement pulls it back when the market reopens.
A short rebalance delay would chase that move and reposition into a price that is about to revert. A 72-hour delay sits out the entire round trip, realizes nothing, and collects the fees generated by all that volume on the way through.
"I completely dodge that and when settlement happens I'm right back to where I was. Zero rebalances, zero impermanent loss, and I earned probably crazy fees from that volume coming through."
This is why the stock pools on MaxFi run longer conservative delays than the crypto pools do. It is a structural difference between an asset that trades continuously and one that does not.
What Gets Listed, and What Does Not
There are hundreds of thousands of Meme Coins on Robinhood Chain. A few dozen are on MaxFi. The filter is manual and it is applied before anything appears on the site.
Every token gets read:
- The contract source must be verified and readable. An unverified contract cannot be assessed, so it does not get listed.
- No mint function. Supply cannot be inflated after the fact.
- No pause, no blacklist, no fee switch. Your ability to exit cannot be revoked, and the tax cannot be turned on after you are in.
- Token distribution checked. A deployer or team sitting on half the supply is a disqualifier.
- Trading history checked for wash trading, and volume and market cap have to be established rather than hypothetical.
What that process does not do is predict the price, and Alex is precise about the boundary:
"I don't know what the price is going to do. I can't guarantee the price will go up, go sideways, go down. But I can tell you this token cannot rug pull you. I can tell you this liquidity pool is healthy and active. And I can tell you the tokens are distributed in a more favorable way than something that's set up to game the system."
That is the honest limit of due diligence on a Meme Coin, and it is worth more than it sounds. The most common way people lose money on these is not a price decline, it is a contract that could always take the money.
A lot of the listings came from the community surfacing candidates, which are then vetted before going up.
Position Sizing, Plainly
Everything above describes a small part of a portfolio.
Alex's own structure: roughly $70,000 in correlated blue chip accumulator pairs on Base, which is where the actual work is being done, and about 5% of the portfolio in speculative high-yield plays. Around 90 positions across Snuggle and MaxFi in total, running hands-off.
The advice given on camera is a 10% cap on Meme Coins, 20% if you have real experience with them:
"If you have a portfolio, let's say $10,000, you're not going to want to put more than 10% into meme coins. You got to use some self-control."
Several of these positions have already returned more than went in. That means the cost basis is recovered, not that the risk is gone. The remaining position stays fully exposed and the token can still go to zero. The rates throughout this article come from pools that are two to three weeks old, carrying enormous volume against very little liquidity, which is the entire reason the numbers are large and why they compress as liquidity arrives.
Size it accordingly, and the rest of this is upside.
Democratizing Market Making
Roughly 20,000 to 30,000 wallets in the world provide liquidity through sophisticated systems. That is the entire population of people doing this properly, out of everyone in crypto. On tokenized stocks specifically the number is smaller still, because the assets are weeks old and almost nobody has worked out what they are yet.
That is the opportunity, and it is not subtle. A retail participant with a few thousand dollars can now occupy a role that used to require a balance sheet:
"Now they can become a market maker for those stocks without having to have billions of dollars like a Jane Street, like a Citadel. Bringing in a couple thousand bucks and boom, they're a market maker on their favorite stocks."
MaxFi's community currently provides somewhere between 20 and 30 percent of the liquidity on most of these pairs. When someone trades SPY, or gold, or a Meme Coin on Robinhood Chain, a meaningful share of the fee they pay lands in the wallets of people reading this. That fee is the spread that market makers have always collected. What changed is who gets to collect it.
$53,000 a day is going back to the community right now. Alex is running 90 positions hands off and rolling Meme Coin profits into blue chips he intends to hold into the bull market. TIG recovered a $5,000 cost basis in twelve days. None of these people are doing anything you cannot do this afternoon.
The window is the part worth acting on. Tokenized stocks are weeks old, the pools are thin, the fee rates reflect that, and there are only a few thousand people on earth who understand what to do about it. That will not be true in a year.
Start small and start now. Three to five tokens rather than one, a few hundred dollars, a wide range and a long delay. Collect the fees when price runs past your range and move the profits into something you want to own for years.
Open a position on Snuggle · Track your positions
Come and post your positions in the Snuggle Discord. A large share of what gets listed came from people in the community finding it first, and the next pool everyone piles into is probably sitting in someone's message right now.
Not financial advice. Meme Coins frequently go to zero. Community results referenced here are self-reported. Impermanent loss is reduced by no-swap rebalancing, not eliminated. Tokenized stocks depend on Robinhood's off-chain settlement and on arbitrage holding the token to the underlying, which does not trade when markets are closed. DeFi carries smart contract, market and liquidity risk. Never invest more than you can afford to lose.
Stay ahead of the market
Get yield updates, new pool alerts, and market insights from Snuggle.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Frequently Asked Questions
This video is about MaxFi and Robinhood Chain. Why is it on the Snuggle site?
Because the engine is the same one. Snuggle rebalancing is what both platforms run: the same no-swap architecture, the same rebalance delay, the same per-position ownership, the same contracts underneath. MaxFi is deliberately where new chains and interface work land first, so it gets rolled out fast, debugged with an active community beating on it, and then moves to Snuggle once it is battle tested. Robinhood Chain is following exactly that path. So everything here about what a swap-based reposition costs, why impermanent loss is only realized at a rebalance, what the delay is protecting, and why wide ranges beat tight ones on a volatile token applies to your Snuggle positions today, on the pools Snuggle already runs. The Robinhood-specific assets are the part still in the sandbox.
How does a $79 position earn $676 without the token going up?
Because a liquidity position earns the swap fee on every trade that passes through it, not on the price of the token. The HMM pool charges 1% per trade, and that fee is split among the liquidity that is in range at the moment of the trade. A volatile token trading heavily against a thin pool generates an enormous number of those trades. Alex's position collected its share of them for 17 days. The token itself went down, came back and went up again over that period, and the fees accrued the whole time regardless of direction. He then harvested the fees and sold the token portion into strength rather than holding it, which is why the earnings are realized rather than paper.
Why are Meme Coin pools so bad for normal rebalancing systems?
Four costs stack on a thin, volatile market, and the largest one is the one nobody counts. Start with the visible three. The swap fee: these pools charge 1%, and a swap-based rebalancer pays it on the entire position value every time it repositions. Slippage and price impact, because a book holding tens of thousands of dollars cannot absorb a several-thousand-dollar swap without moving. And MEV, because a predictable, public rebalance transaction on an illiquid pair is easy to front-run. The fourth is structural rather than transactional: swapping to rebalance sells the token that fell and buys the token that rose, at the exact moment the two have diverged furthest, which crystallizes that divergence. A swap-based reposition therefore realizes roughly double the impermanent loss that a no-swap reposition does. Unlike the fees, that one does not improve when the pool gets deeper, and it lands on every single rebalance. On a blue chip pair all of this is an efficiency drag. On a Meme Coin pool it can exceed everything the position earned, which is why manual Meme Coin farming usually loses money even when the fee rate looks spectacular.
What does the rebalance delay actually do?
It stops the system from acting on a move that is about to reverse. Impermanent loss is only realized at the moment a rebalance fires. Price leaving your range costs you nothing on its own, it just stops you earning until it comes back. On a Meme Coin that spikes 40% and retraces within a day, a system with no delay repositions at the top and again on the way back, realizing loss twice for nothing. With a delay set, the same round trip triggers zero rebalances and the position simply resumes earning. This is also why the delay pairs with width: a wide range plus a long delay means most moves resolve themselves.
If these positions have already paid back their deposit, are they risk-free?
No. House money means the original deposit has been recovered in fees, so the cost basis is back. The remaining position is still fully exposed. The token can go to zero, the pool can dry up, and the value sitting in the position can keep falling. What recovering the cost basis genuinely changes is the psychology and the risk of ruin on that individual position, not the risk itself. It is also worth being clear that the rates in this video come from pools that are two to three weeks old with enormous volume relative to liquidity, which is precisely why they are so large, and they compress as liquidity arrives.
How much of a portfolio should go into Meme Coin pools?
Ten percent, and both Alex and DAO King say so on camera. Twenty if you have experience with them and know what you are doing. Alex's own allocation is about 5% of his portfolio in speculative high-yield plays, with roughly $70,000 in correlated blue chip accumulator pairs on Base doing the actual work. The Meme Coin positions are funded with small amounts, three to five tokens rather than one, and the profits are rolled into the slower positions rather than compounded back into the casino. Anyone treating this as a majority allocation has misread the video.
What stops a token you list from being a rug pull?
Every token is read before it goes on the site. The contract source has to be verified and readable, because an unverified contract cannot be assessed at all. There has to be no mint function, no pause, no blacklist and no fee switch, so the supply cannot be inflated and your ability to exit cannot be revoked. Token distribution gets checked so the deployer or team is not holding half the supply, and the trading history gets checked for wash trading. Volume and market cap have to be established rather than hypothetical. What that does not do is predict price. The distinction Alex draws is that he cannot tell you a token will go up, but he can tell you the contract cannot rug you and the pool is real.
How long does this window actually last?
Long enough to matter, and not as long as people assume. Roughly 20,000 to 30,000 wallets in the entire world provide liquidity through sophisticated systems. That is the whole population of people doing this properly, out of everyone in crypto. On tokenized stocks the number is smaller again, because the assets are weeks old and almost nobody has worked out what they are yet. That is why the rates look the way they do: thin pools, enormous volume, and very few people competing for the fees. MaxFi's community is currently providing 20 to 30 percent of the liquidity on most of these pairs, which means when someone trades SPY or gold or a Meme Coin on Robinhood Chain, a real share of the fee they pay lands in the wallets of people who read an article like this one and acted on it. $53,000 a day is going back to the community right now. Alex runs 90 positions hands off and rolls the Meme Coin profits into blue chips he plans to hold into the bull market. TIG recovered a $5,000 cost basis in twelve days. None of that requires anything you cannot start this afternoon with a few hundred dollars. What it does require is being early, and the thing about being the market maker rather than the trader is that you get paid whether the market goes up or down. The pools get deeper, the rates normalize, and the people who were already in them keep collecting on a bigger book. That is the trade.


